Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Citation
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Parent Document
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2020-08-11
Other Sections in This Document (35)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
Full Text
939 charsAlternatively, the landlords argue that, even if the quoted language from the judicial branch form is required, dismissal was not the proper remedy. However, contrary to the landlords’ assertions, we have consistently ruled that strict compliance with the mandates of RSA chapter 540 is required. See Buatti v. Prentice, 162 N.H. 228, 230 (2011); So. Willow Properties, 159 N.H. at 498; Matte, 152 N.H. at 218; Lavoie v. Szumiez, 115 N.H. 266, 267 (1975). A dismissal on the grounds that the landlord’s eviction notice fails to comply with statutory requisites is not a judgment on the merits and does not preclude the landlord from filing a new eviction notice and a new writ for possession. See So. Willow Properties, 159 N.H. at 499 (holding that “the trial court’s dismissal, based upon a technical defect in the notice to quit, was not a decision on the merits” and, accordingly, did not bar the landlord’s second lawsuit). Of course,