Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Citation
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Parent Document
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2020-08-11
Other Sections in This Document (35)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
- Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
Full Text
615 charsTo support their argument, the landlords rely upon Darbouze. Darbouze is instructive, but contrary to the landlords’ assertions, is not dispositive. In that case, the tenant argued that the eviction notice was defective because it was entitled “Notice to Quit.” Darbouze, 160 N.H. at 698 (quotation omitted). In rejecting this argument, we observed that “while the better practice would be the use of the term ‘eviction notice,’ we find no statutory prohibition against the use of the term ‘notice to quit,’ as long as the substance of the notice satisfies the three . . . requirements” enumerated in RSA 540:3. Id.