Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)

Citation
Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
Parent Document
Richard Horton & a. v. David Clemens & a. (2020)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
2020-08-11

Other Sections in This Document (35)

Full Text

659 chars
The record reveals the following facts. The landlords initiated this
possessory action by serving the tenants on June 4, 2019, with a demand for
rent owed for June and a notice of eviction. The eviction notice informed them
that they had until June 12 to vacate the premises, stated specifically that they
were being evicted for “failure to pay rent due,” and informed the tenants of
their right to avoid eviction by paying “all the arrearages plus fifteen dollars
($15.00) as liquidated damages, in accordance with RSA 540:9.” However, the
eviction notice did not include the following information, which appears in the
judicial branch form eviction notice: