L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- Citation
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- Parent Document
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 1995-07-20
Other Sections in This Document (19)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
Full Text
748 charsEXPERT TESTIMONY Defendant next argues that the testimony of Plaintiff's expert witness as to a reasonable rental value of between $650.00 and $800.00 for the premises should be disregarded because he described the color of the house as "blue" rather than "brown," the latter being the actual color. Defendant surmises that Plaintiff's expert's appraisal was based on the wrong house. Conversely, Plaintiff argues that its expert appraised the correct house and such description of the color was a mere misstatement which should be viewed within the otherwise accurate description of the house. And regardless of this, Plaintiff argues that such inconsistency should only go to the weight of the evidence and not to the competency of the testimony.