L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- Citation
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- Parent Document
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 1995-07-20
Other Sections in This Document (19)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
- L.T.F. Financial Services, Inc. v. Silva, 95-1305 (1995) (1995)
Full Text
504 charsConsequently, Plaintiff commenced trespass and ejectment proceedings in the Sixth Division District Court against Defendant in January, 1995. On March 3, 1995, judgment was entered for the Plaintiff for possession of the premises, damages in the amount of $1,193.00, and interest and costs. The District Court further ordered that in the event of an appeal, the Defendant was ordered to pay rent in the amount of $500.00 per month, first payment due March 9, 1995. Defendant timely appealed the decision.