Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Kingstown Mobile Home Park v. Strashnick, 774 A.2d 847 (2001)

Citation
Kingstown Mobile Home Park v. Strashnick, 774 A.2d 847 (2001)
Parent Document
Kingstown Mobile Home Park v. Strashnick, 774 A.2d 847 (2001)
Jurisdiction
Rhode Island (state)
Effective Date
2001-06-26

Other Sections in This Document (146)

Full Text

886 chars
We have addressed this issue repeatedly and have held that when a party “both fail[s] and neglect[s] to comply with its clear obligation when challenging the constitutionality of a state statute to ‘serve the attorney general with a copy of the *853proceedings,’ * * * [w]e do not believe that this Court should undertake to determine the constitutionality of a state statute in a given case without first affording the Attorney General the opportunity to intervene and be heard. See Crossman v. Erickson, 570 A.2d 651, 654 (R.I.1990).” Global Waste Recycling, Inc. v. Mallette, 762 A.2d 1208, 1214 (R.I.2000). Although on May 14,1998, Krzak amended her original complaint to include an attack on the constitutionality of § 81-44-2, she failed to give the required notice to the Attorney General, and thus we affirm the trial justice’s decision to preclude the constitutional challenge.