Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/796925.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
Full Text
1,742 chars17, 2015, and suspended Pope without pay.3 Pope did not believe that she had missed any scheduled work shifts because she had worked out a schedule with her client that did not require her to be with the client on those days. The suspension letter specifically stated that one of the reasons for the suspension was AHS’s need to accommodate her disability and that Pope would only be reinstated if her physician guaranteed that Pope was medically cleared to work as a home health aide. Pope subsequently had a medical provider send AHS an e-mail stating that she was cleared to work. AHS did not request any further medical opinions from any other providers. Instead, despite having received a doctor’s note stating that Pope was cleared to work, which is exactly what it had demanded from Pope in its suspension letter, AHS responded to Pope’s medical provider with an e-mail stating that it believed Pope could not use the telephone clock in system, that she lied about her work hours, and that she was a danger to vulnerable clients and could not work. AHS’s e-mail demanded that Pope’s 3 It also appears that AHS accused Pope of refusing to show up for a shift on July 20, 2015, the same day that she was suspended. However, the City presented evidence in which Pope stated that she was told not to go to her client’s house that day and was suspended before she could begin the shift. 4 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 79692-5-I/5 medical provider complete another assessment, send it a guarantee that Pope would be able to use the telephone clock in system in her then-current condition, and opine that Pope would not be a danger to clients. AHS also asserted in its