Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/796925.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
Full Text
1,764 charsheadaches, nausea, sensitivity to light and sound, and issues with her memory. In April 2015, Pope was employed as a home health aide for AHS, a company that provides in-home healthcare to its clients.1 Pope was certified by the Department of Health and Human Services for her job and provided in-home healthcare to AHS clients, helping them with food preparation, laundry, cleaning, toileting, grocery shopping, and sometimes with transportation to medical appointments. AHS utilized a telephone clock in system to keep track of employee hours and shifts.2 This system required employees to call from a client’s telephone to clock in at the beginning of a shift and to call again to clock out at the end of the shift. Pope had difficulty remembering to call to clock in and out, and received a disciplinary notice from AHS regarding the issue in May 2015. In response, Pope informed AHS of her then-recent brain surgery and provided a note from her 1 AHS was founded by Gideon Oyeleke in 2000, and by 2015 employed approximately 50 to 60 home health aides. 2 AHS implemented the telephone clock in system in 2012. Before 2012, AHS utilized a paper time sheet system to keep track of employee hours. 2 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 79692-5-I/3 doctor describing the symptoms she continued to suffer as aftereffects of the surgery, including her memory problems. Pope also informed AHS that she believed there was a discrepancy between the hours that she had worked and the pay that she had received. AHS blamed the discrepancy on Pope’s failure to properly clock in and out using the telephone system. During this time, Pope also submitted paper time sheets recording the hours she worked.