Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Calder v. Anderson, 911 P.2d 1157 (1996)

Citation
Calder v. Anderson, 911 P.2d 1157 (1996)
Parent Document
Calder v. Anderson, 911 P.2d 1157 (1996)
Jurisdiction
Montana (state)
Effective Date
1996-02-26

Other Sections in This Document (335)

Full Text

334 chars
[E]ven if a litigant does not oppose summary judgment, the superior court may grant the motion only if otherwise “appropriate” under Rule 56. Weaver Bros., Inc. v. Chappel, 684 P.2d 123, 126 *277(Alaska 1984). For this reason, this court should review the superior court’s grant of summary judgment under the usual standard of review.