Skip to main content

Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 980241.pdf

Citation
Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 980241.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source verification
official_capture_completeness_unverified

Full Text

1,780 chars
W. WEAVER, WASHINGTON PRACTICE: REAL ESTATE: PROPERTY LAW § 6.53, at 398

(2d ed. 2004). The tenant’s duties include keeping the premises reasonably clean and

sanitary, refraining from causing damage or committing waste, and “restor[ing] the

premises to their initial condition [upon termination of the tenancy,] except for

reasonable wear and tear or conditions caused by failure of the landlord to comply

with his or her obligations under [the RLTA].” RCW 59.18.130. The landlord may

retain a portion of the deposit if the tenant fails to perform these duties (provided it

also gives a full and specific statement of the basis within 14 days, see supra note 3,

after vacation of the rental unit), but the landlord cannot withhold any portion of a

deposit due to ordinary wear and tear. RCW 59.18.280(1)(a); see also Stoebuck,

supra, at 1030 (“[T]he landlord is entitled in Washington to retain out of the deposit

only so much as will compensate him for his actual damages upon the tenant’s

breach. In other words, no part of the deposit becomes the landlord’s until the

breach.” (footnote omitted)). Also, the RLTA provisions governing security deposits

11
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.
Silver v. Rudeen Mgmt. Co.
No. 98024-1

are among the few sections of the act that provide for an award of costs and

reasonable attorney fees for the prevailing party. See RCW 58.18.260, .270, .280.

Within the statutorily allotted time after the termination of a residential

tenancy, the landlord must either return the tenant’s deposit or provide “a full and

specific statement of the basis for retaining any of the deposit together with the

payment of any refund due the tenant under the terms and conditions of the rental