Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Citation
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Parent Document
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Jurisdiction
- Maine (state)
- Effective Date
- 1897-08-16
Other Sections in This Document (14)
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
- Seavey v. Cloudman, 90 Me. 536 (1897)
Full Text
472 charsThe only question presented by counsel, and the only question decided by us, is whether the plaintiff’s tenancy had been terminated prior to the eviction of the plaintiff. The plaintiff says it had not. The defendant contends that it had, by alienation, by the sale from plaintiff’s landlord to Mousam Lodge, and by the lease from Mousam Lodge to Cushman. Either was an alienation, and if either transaction terminated the tenancy of the plaintiff, it is immaterial which.