Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)

Citation: Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
Parent Document: Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
Jurisdiction: Maine (state)
Effective Date: 1991-11-01
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5129878/fraser-v-fraser/ ↗

Full Text

805 chars

In granting summary judgment in favor of Barry and Phoebe, the Superior Court determined that Duane Fraser was not entitled to occupy the premises and remanded the case to District Court for the issuance of a writ of possession. Duane contends on appeal that summary judgment was improperly entered against him because there are material factual disputes in regard to his status as a tenant, whether the lease was amended after the mobile home was destroyed and replaced by the current *754dwelling, and whether Barry and Phoebe Fraser are estopped from denying his right to reside in the premises. In considering Duane’s contentions, we review the record in a light most favorable to him, see St. Louis v. Hartley’s Oldsmobile-GMC, 570 A.2d 1213, 1215 (Me.1990), and conclude that they are without merit.

Other Sections in This Document (18)

Full Text