Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Citation
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Parent Document
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Jurisdiction
- Maine (state)
- Effective Date
- 1991-11-01
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5129878/fraser-v-fraser/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (18)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
Full Text
968 charsIn 1976, shortly after she was widowed, Estelle entered into a lease agreement with her son Barry and his wife Phoebe, under which Estelle would be permitted to live in a mobile home located on a 100 X 150-foot portion of Barry’s and Phoebe’s land in Harpswell. The lease provided that Estelle could live on those premises “for so long as [she] should desire to reside in said mobile home on the leased premises or until her death, whichever is first to occur.” Estelle was to pay rent of one dollar per year and the taxes assessed by the Town on the leased portion of the premises. Upon termination, the mobile home could be removed, but “all appurtenant systems, fixtures and structures shall remain on the premises and shall become the property of the Lessors.” The lease also specifically provided that the mobile home was to be occupied by Estelle and Estelle’s daughter, Karen Fraser, and that Karen could occupy the premises only while Estelle was living there.