Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)

Citation: Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
Parent Document: Fraser v. Fraser, 598 A.2d 751 (1991)
Jurisdiction: Maine (state)
Effective Date: 1991-11-01
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5129878/fraser-v-fraser/ ↗

Full Text

596 chars

Estelle and Duane filed a motion for summary judgment in the Superior Court. After a hearing, the Superior Court granted the motion as to Estelle, allowing her to remain on the premises as long as she complies with the terms of the lease. The court, however, entered judgment for Barry and Phoebe against Duane,2 concluding that Duane is not entitled to occupancy of the premises under the terms of the lease. Following denial of their motion for reconsideration based on the Superior Court’s alleged failure to decide the issue of title to *753the dwelling, Estelle and Duane filed this appeal.3

Other Sections in This Document (18)

Full Text