Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Citation
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Parent Document
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Jurisdiction
- Maine (state)
- Effective Date
- 2019-01-29
Other Sections in This Document (27)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
- Sherwood Assocs. LP v. Jackson, 200 A.3d 1259 (2019)
Full Text
673 chars[¶8] After the court received the briefs, it affirmed the District Court judgment pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 80D(f)(1), (5), having determined that Jackson's affidavit did not raise a genuine issue of material fact that would entitle him to a jury trial and that he had not properly raised any errors of law. Jackson filed a motion to reconsider along with several purported "amendments," which the court denied. Jackson filed another document after the denial, prompting the Superior Court to issue another order stating that its denial stood. Represented by new counsel, Jackson brought this appeal. II. LEGAL ANALYSIS A. Sufficiency of Evidence to Support the FED Judgment