Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Citation
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Parent Document
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1985-05-21
Other Sections in This Document (9)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
Full Text
538 charsAt the time of the offer of the October rent, the plaintiff was in possession of the sum of $2825 deposited by the defendant as security for the defendant’s com*86pliance with the terms of the lease. The rent due for September was $3075. The defendant claims that inasmuch as the plaintiff had the right to apply the security deposit towards the September rent and a balance of $250 would then have remained unpaid, forfeiture of the defendant’s rights under the lease constitutes an unconscionable hardship to the defendant. We disagree.