Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Citation
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Parent Document
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1985-05-21
Other Sections in This Document (9)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
- Yervant v. BAJ Corp., 4 Conn. App. 84 (1985)
Full Text
466 charsThe defendant principally claims that the trial court erred in finding that the defendant was in default of its lease (1) because the plaintiff had accepted payment of rent from the defendant prior to giving notice to quit to the defendant, and (2) because the plaintiff held a security deposit covering a substantial portion of the overdue rent, and that forfeiture of the defendant’s rights under its lease constitutes an unconscionable hardship. We find no error.