State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)

Citation: State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
Parent Document: State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2024-11-05
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10230471/state-v-sinchak/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (26)

State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)
State v. Sinchak, 229 Conn. App. 38 (2024)

Full Text

433 chars

We conclude that the trial court’s decision granting
         the defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence
         is not an immediately appealable final judgment, as it
         does not fit within either prong of Curcio or the Solo-
         mon exception to the final judgment rule. Accordingly,
         this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this
         appeal from that decision. The appeal is dismissed.