Gentile-Riaz v. Samo Thraki, LLC (2025)

Citation: Gentile-Riaz v. Samo Thraki, LLC (2025)
Parent Document: Gentile-Riaz v. Samo Thraki, LLC (2025)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2025-12-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10758261/gentile-riaz-v-samo-thraki-llc/ ↗

Full Text

889 chars

’’Finally, where a jurisdictional determination is
       dependent on the resolution of a critical factual dispute,
       it cannot be decided on a motion to dismiss in the
       absence of an evidentiary hearing to establish jurisdic-
       tional facts. . . . In that situation, [a]n evidentiary
       hearing is necessary because a court cannot make a
       critical factual [jurisdictional] finding based on memo-
       randa and documents submitted by the parties.’’ (Inter-
       nal quotation marks omitted.) Godbout v. Attanasio,
       supra, 199 Conn. App. 96–97. In the present case, the
       factual allegations set forth in the complaint were sup-
       plemented by undisputed facts contained in documents,
       including the plaintiff’s health district complaint,
       attached to Midway Pizza’s memorandum of law in sup-
       port of its motion to dismiss.

Other Sections in This Document (43)

Full Text