Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Gentile-Riaz v. Samo Thraki, LLC (2025)

Citation
Gentile-Riaz v. Samo Thraki, LLC (2025)
Parent Document
Gentile-Riaz v. Samo Thraki, LLC (2025)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2025-12-16

Other Sections in This Document (43)

Full Text

1,017 chars
these supplementary undisputed facts and need not
       conclusively presume the validity of the allegations of
       the complaint. . . . Rather, those allegations are tem-
       pered by the light shed on them by the [supplementary
       undisputed facts]. . . . If affidavits and/or other evi-
       dence submitted in support of a defendant’s motion to
       dismiss conclusively establish that jurisdiction is lack-
       ing, and the plaintiff fails to undermine this conclusion
       with counteraffidavits . . . or other evidence, the trial
       court may dismiss the action without further proceed-
       ings. . . . If, however, the defendant submits either no
       proof to rebut the plaintiff’s jurisdictional allegations
       . . . or only evidence that fails to call those allegations
       into question . . . the plaintiff need not supply count-
       eraffidavits or other evidence to support the complaint,
       but may rest on the jurisdictional allegations therein.
       . . .