Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 21-79

Citation
Section 21-79
Parent Document
Eamiello v. Liberty Mobile Home Sales, Inc., 208 Conn. 620 (1988)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1988-08-16

Other Sections in This Document (80)

Full Text

924 chars
The defendant also claims that the trial court erred in determining that the plaintiffs had satisfied the requirements of the supplemental judgment in an unreported action the defendant had brought against the town of Prospect, Liberty Mobile Home Sales, Inc. v. Prospect, Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford, Docket No. 106145 (September 23, 1982). It also maintains that the court erred in declining to decide whether such requirements were actually binding upon the plaintiffs. In that action the defendant in this case sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the enforcement of certain Prospect zoning regulations. The court in a supplemental judgment rendered on September 23, 1982, ordered “[t]hat all owners of mobile homes within the park will be required to obtain a building permit and certificate of occupancy from the Town prior to resale of their mobile homes . . . .”