Section 47a-20

Citation: Section 47a-20
Parent Document: Wilson v. Jefferson, 908 A.2d 13 (2006)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2006-10-17
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1559455/wilson-v-jefferson/ ↗

Full Text

1,069 chars

indicate outrageous conduct — actions in violation of Connecticut law in prosecuting the eviction actions. The defendant admitted, through her attorney, that she was in the business of renting apartments. . . . This count should have gone to the jury at least so far as monetary losses and also on the emotional injuries.” (Citation omitted; emphasis in original.) No legal analysis, legal citation or direction to the evidence in support of a CUPTA claim are presented to this court in the plaintiffs brief. Accordingly, we decline to review this claim. “[W]e are not required to review issues that have been improperly presented to this court through an inadequate brief. . . . Analysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failing to brief the issue properly. . . . Where the parties cite no law and provide no analysis of their claims, we do not review such claims.” *167 (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Turner v. American Car Rental, Inc., 92 Conn. App. 123, 130-31, 884 A.2d 7 (2005). VI

Other Sections in This Document (105)

Full Text