In the Matter of David Glenn Baker (2025)

Citation: In the Matter of David Glenn Baker (2025)
Parent Document: In the Matter of David Glenn Baker (2025)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2025-08-18
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10655743/in-the-matter-of-david-glenn-baker/ ↗

Full Text

743 chars

Third, and finally, in connection with the proceedings before the hearing committee, the respondent notes that he was the only witness who testified before the committee and suggests that there was no "conflicting testimony" that the hearing committee could credit over the respondent.  In other words, it seems, the respondent is arguing that because he was the only testifying witness, the hearing committee was required to credit his testimony.  The hearing committee was under no such obligation.  The respondent is not wrong that assistant bar counsel's arguments were not evidence, but there was ample documentary evidence to support those arguments and upon which the hearing committee could, and did, base its findings and conclusions.

Other Sections in This Document (48)

Full Text