In the Matter of David Glenn Baker (2025)

Citation: In the Matter of David Glenn Baker (2025)
Parent Document: In the Matter of David Glenn Baker (2025)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2025-08-18
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10655743/in-the-matter-of-david-glenn-baker/ ↗

Full Text

830 chars

Among other arguments, the respondent suggests that he was unaware that, prior to withdrawing, the attorney who had been representing him had not produced the records to bar counsel and that bar counsel did not so notify the respondent.  Bar counsel, however, neither had an obligation to notify the respondent nor prevented introduction of the records; rather, she filed a motion in limine to preclude the respondent from introducing evidence at the hearing that he had not previously disclosed, as he had been required to do.  The hearing committee allowed the motion.  The lack of any medical records to support his claims that he could not complete the required ethics class was, in short, a problem of the respondent's own making.  Furthermore, he had several years to complete an acceptable course and still failed to do so.

Other Sections in This Document (48)

Full Text