In the Matter of David Glenn Baker (2025)

Citation: In the Matter of David Glenn Baker (2025)
Parent Document: In the Matter of David Glenn Baker (2025)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2025-08-18
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10655743/in-the-matter-of-david-glenn-baker/ ↗

Full Text

967 chars

Finally, the hearing committee found, and the board accepted, that the respondent violated Mass. R. Prof. C. 3.3 (a) (1), 8.4 (d), and 8.4 (h), because he intentionally misrepresented himself to the Probate and Family Court as the mother's attorney and as the estate fiduciary, neither of which was true.  The respondent argues that he never identified himself as the mother's attorney in the probate case and that he only identified himself as the estate fiduciary because he had possession of the foreclosure proceeds check.  The respondent, however, filed documents in the probate case, signed under the pains and penalties of perjury, in which he identified himself as the mother's attorney and as the estate fiduciary.  As with counts one and two, the respondent made false statements to the court, in violation of Mass. R. Prof. C. 3.3 (a) (1), and, again, in engaging in the conduct associated with count three, violated both Mass. R. Prof. C. 8.4 (d) and (h).

Other Sections in This Document (48)

Full Text