Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/389189_pub.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
Full Text
1,722 charsHous. Ass’n v. City of Seattle, 22 Wn. App. 2d 426, 452-53, 512 P.3d 545 (2022) (Out-of- 5 The statute indicates a trial is proper if “there is a genuine issue of a material fact pertaining to a legal or equitable defense or set-off.” RCW 59.18.380 (emphasis added). A tenant’s legal defense might be a claim that the landlord’s basis for eviction is untrue. See, e.g., Webster, 18 Wn. App. 2d at 256-57. Or the tenant may have an affirmative defense that admits the landlord’s allegations, but nevertheless claims a right of possession. See, e.g., Josephinium Assocs. v. Kahli, 111 Wn. App. 617, 621, 45 P.3d 627 (2002). Either way, the statute suggests the tenant has a right to a trial if the tenant has raised a genuine issue of material fact. 22 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 38918-9-III Kiemle & Hagood Co. v. Daniels possession landlords retain a property interest protected by due process principles.). A landlord may enjoy their property as an investment free from unreasonable risk. By failing to keep an apartment in a clean and sanitary condition, a tenant may interfere with their landlord’s right to a secure investment, insofar as they risk permanent damage to the apartment or disturbances to the landlord’s other tenants. Second, Ms. Daniels argues genuine issues of material fact remain as to whether her conduct was a sufficiently severe interference with K&H’s use and enjoyment of the property. We note that RCW 59.18.650(2)(c)’s phrase, “unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of the premises,” echoes a common definition of “nuisance.” See Moore v. Steve’s Outboard Serv., 182 Wn.2d 151, 155, 339 P.3d 169 (2014) (“[A]n