Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/389189_pub.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 389189_pub.pdf
Full Text
1,735 charsallegations, such as where the tenant’s purportedly violative conduct is alleged threats, harassment, or violence directed at specific people. See, e.g., Swords to Plowshares, 294 F. Supp. 2d at 1068 n.1; Tacoma Rescue Mission, 155 Wn. App. at 256-57; Harris v. Paris Hous. Auth., 632 S.W.3d 167, 173 (Tex. App. 2021). But here, the information supplied to Ms. Daniels made clear that K&H was relying on the generally unsanitary condition of her apartment, conduct that could plausibly impair others’ enjoyment even when discrete victims are difficult to identify. See Tacoma Rescue Mission, 155 Wn. App. at 257 (faulting landlord for failing to name in notice the individuals who reported tenant’s excessive noise and threats); see also Midland Mgmt. Co. v. Helgason, 241 Ill. App. 3d 899, 911, 913, 608 N.E.2d 643 (1993) (notice sufficient where it apprised tenant they were being evicted for allowing “careless leakage of water”), rev’d on other grounds, 158 Ill.2d 98, 630 N.E.2d 836 (1994). And the condition of Ms. Daniels’s apartment had been extensively documented in prior notices, as referenced in the 19 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 38918-9-III Kiemle & Hagood Co. v. Daniels December 27 notice. See Martinez v. Hous. Auth., 264 Ga. App. 282, 286-87, 590 S.E.2d 245 (2003) (The notice was sufficiently specific where it cited the tenant’s “‘history of lease violations and warnings’” and referred to those prior warnings.). K&H’s notice therefore gave Ms. Daniels a sufficient opportunity to defend against its allegations. Whether the court should have ordered a trial The parties debate whether Ms. Daniels was entitled to a trial at the conclusion