§ 3

Citation: § 3
Parent Document: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sutton (2023)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2023-08-23
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9421978/wells-fargo-bank-na-v-sutton/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (208)

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sutton (2023)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sutton (2023)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sutton (2023)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sutton (2023)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sutton (2023)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sutton (2023)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sutton (2023)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sutton (2023)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sutton (2023)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sutton (2023)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sutton (2023)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sutton (2023)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sutton (2023)
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 3
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36
§ 36

Full Text

528 chars

5 The law also prohibited, in a "non-essential eviction,"
scheduling a summary process trial, entering a judgment for
possession for the plaintiff, issuing an execution for
possession, or denying a defendant's request to continue
proceedings or to stay an execution. St. 2020, c. 65, § 3 (b).
                                                                  11 statute did not prohibit a court from accepting a notice of appeal and should not have been read as broader than it was written. The law also provided the following: