Scott Egbert v. Richard Jorgensen (2025)
is a rebuttable presumption that the landlord’s eviction notice was an act of retaliation against the
Showing 61–80 of 269 results
is a rebuttable presumption that the landlord’s eviction notice was an act of retaliation against the
issued the 90-day eviction notice for retaliatory purposes based on its timing—it was issued only
is a rebuttable presumption that the landlord’s eviction notice was an act of retaliation against the
issued the 90-day eviction notice for retaliatory purposes based on its timing—it was issued only
• RCW 59.18.650(2)(a). The right to a 14-day notice of eviction after a default in the payment of rent.
eviction notice on the tenant. RCW 59.18.200(1 )(a).^ If the tenant has not complied
eviction notice on the tenant. RCW 59.18.200(1 )(a).^ If the tenant has not complied
the police told her to.” Id. at 791. He never received a notice of eviction, but a
...presumption of retaliatory eviction where a landlord evicts within ninety days after a tenant complains to a government agency. But because Hanline’s lease had expired, the presumption does not apply. Failure to comply with notice requirements under the JCEO...
Authority was seeking to evict them. However, it is unclear if the Knights actually received such notice.13
...The issue of whether or not Harvest Manor waived its right to evict Mr. Padilla by accepting rent after service of the first and/or the second notices is not before this court. The trial court did not decide that...
...The issue of whether or not Harvest Manor waived its right to evict Mr. Padilla by accepting rent after service of the first and/or the second notices is not before this court. The trial court did not decide that...
...It also bars those landlords from issuing a notice to vacate during the 120-day period. In contrast to the eviction and late fee protections of Section 4024(b), which are expressly limited to nonpayment, Section 4024(c) does not...
Nevertheless, under the unique facts of this case, we find that the notice given to Allan was adequate. The Kennedys originally served Allan's predecessor tenant McGuire with a notice to evict on June 28, 1978. The original notice required...
Michael and Sherri Purvis contend the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over this eviction case because the landlord's notice of eviction failed to comply with the terms of RCW 59.18, the Residential Landlord-Tenant Act. We agree and...
• RCW 59.18.650(2)(c). The right to a three-day notice of eviction after committing or permitting waste or nuisance upon the premises.
court judge implicitly determined that the CARES Act required 30 days’ notice only for evictions stemming from nonpayment of rent.
We reject Price’s argument that each time HRG accepted his rent after issuing a three-day notice, it waived its right to evict him. The record clearly shows that HRG applied his rent to the earliest obligation first. The...
We reject Price's argument that each time HRG accepted his rent after issuing a three-day notice, it waived its right to evict him. The record clearly shows that HRG applied his rent to the earliest obligation first. The...
pursuant to a notice of termination or eviction using this subparagraph as the cause for eviction.[30]