Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)

Citation: Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Parent Document: Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2000-01-10
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2615504/carlstrom-v-hanline/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (56)

Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)

Full Text

473 chars

Because the lease was terminated as a matter of law, there is no question of just cause eviction or retaliatory eviction. RCW 59.18.250 creates a rebuttable presumption of retaliatory eviction where a landlord evicts within ninety days after a tenant complains to a government agency. But because Hanline’s lease had expired, the presumption does not apply. Failure to comply with notice requirements under the JCEO defeats the court’s jurisdiction. Housing Auth. v. Silva,