Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)

Citation: Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Parent Document: Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2000-01-10
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2615504/carlstrom-v-hanline/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (56)

Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)

Full Text

470 chars

Carlstrom informed Hanline that his lease was due to expire on April 1, 1998. Hanline disputed this contention and complained to DCLU. On March 31, 1998, DCLU informed Carlstrom that the notice to terminate did not comply with Seattle’s Just Cause Eviction Ordinance (JCEO, Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) 22.206.160C). DCLU explained that Carlstrom’s reason for terminating the lease — expiration of the lease — was not just cause and ordered that the notice be rescinded.