Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 1–20 of 57 results

Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)

Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003) Washington state

...Stalick’s “failfure] to exercise reasonable care to repair the condition was a violation of the implied warranty of habitability.” CP at 162-63. The RLTA provision relating to habitability partly states:

Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)

Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003) Washington state

...Stalick's "fail[ure] to exercise reasonable care to repair the condition was a violation of the implied warranty of habitability." CP at 162-63. The RLTA provision relating to habitability partly states:

Lian v. Stalick, 106 Wash. App. 811 (2001)

Lian v. Stalick, 106 Wash. App. 811 (2001) Washington state

Generally, at common law, a landlord had neither a duty to provide habitable rental property nor a duty to repair rental property. Hughes v. Chehalis Sch. Dist. No. 302, 61 Wn.2d 222, 225, 377 P.2d 642 (1963). This...

Lian v. Stalick, 106 Wash. App. 811 (2001)

Lian v. Stalick, 106 Wash. App. 811 (2001) Washington state

...any gratuitous undertaking to repair stairs, or negligent repair of those stairs having undertaken the repair. The court simply concluded that “[b]y not having the steps in a safe condition as a minimum for habitation, the defendants breached their...

Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001)

Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001) Washington state

...any gratuitous undertaking to repair stairs, or negligent repair of those stairs having undertaken the repair. The court simply concluded that "[b]y not having the steps in a safe condition as a minimum for habitation, the defendants breached their...

Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001)

Lian v. Stalick, 25 P.3d 467 (2001) Washington state

Generally, at common law, a landlord had neither a duty to provide habitable rental property nor a duty to repair rental property. Hughes v. Chehalis Sch. Dist. No. 302, 61 Wash.2d 222, 225, 377 P.2d 642 (1963). This...

Sec. 8

Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973) Washington state

...who takes possession of premises with known defects, intends to repair those defects, bargains for reduced monthly payments and characterizes the transaction as a “deal” which he “grabbed,” neither deserves nor needs the protection of an implied warranty of habitability.

Sec. 8

Foisy v. Wyman, 515 P.2d 160 (1973) Washington state

...who takes possession of premises with known defects, intends to repair those defects, bargains for reduced monthly payments and characterizes the transaction as a "deal" which he "grabbed," neither deserves nor needs the protection of an implied warranty of habitability.

Brickler v. Myers Construction, Inc., 966 P.2d 335 (1998)

Brickler v. Myers Construction, Inc., 966 P.2d 335 (1998) Washington state

The Bricklers sued Myers for the cost of repairing the various construction defects, and for breach of the implied warranty of habitability. Myers stipulated that it had breached the warranty, and the matter came on for jury trial.

Thomas Martini v. Paul Post (2013)

Thomas Martini v. Paul Post (2013) Washington state

...taken possession, if he has failed to exercise reasonable care to repair the condition and the existence of the condition is in violation of. ( 1) an implied warranty of habitability; or (2) a duty created by statute or administrative regulation.

Martini v. Post, 178 Wash. App. 153 (2013)

Martini v. Post, 178 Wash. App. 153 (2013) Washington state

...taken possession, if he has failed to exercise reasonable care to repair the condition and the existence of the condition is in violation of: (1) an implied warranty of habitability; or (2) a duty created by statute or administrative regulation.

Olson v. Scholes, 563 P.2d 1275 (1977)

Olson v. Scholes, 563 P.2d 1275 (1977) Washington state

...whether (a) an implied warranty of habitability extended to this lease, or (b) were the lessees entitled to vacate the premises because of their condition; and (3) whether the lessees breached the lease by violating the lease clause on repairs.

Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)

Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003) Washington state

...Stalick contends the court erred by ruling that he was liable under § 17.6 under a theory of negligent repair and that he breached the implied warranty of habitability under the RLTA.

Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003)

Lian v. Stalick, 115 Wash. App. 590 (2003) Washington state

...Stalick contends the court erred by ruling that he was liable under section 17.6 under a theory of negligent repair and that he breached the implied warranty of habitability under the RLTA.

Sjogren v. Properties of Pacific Northwest, LLC, 75 P.3d 592 (2003)

Sjogren v. Properties of Pacific Northwest, LLC, 75 P.3d 592 (2003) Washington state

...possession, if he has failed to exercise reasonable care to repair the condition and the existence of the condition is in violation of: (1) an implied warranty of habitability; or (2) a duty created by statute or administrative regulation. RESTATEMENT...

Martini v. Post, 178 Wash. App. 153 (2013)

Martini v. Post, 178 Wash. App. 153 (2013) Washington state

...opportunity to discover the condition and failed to exercise ordinary care to repair the condition, and (3) that the existence of the condition was a violation of an implied warranty of habitability or a duty created by statute or regulation.

Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)

Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003) Washington state

...condition existing before or arising after the tenant has taken possession, if he has failed to exercise reasonable care to repair the condition and the existence of the condition is in violation of: (1) an implied duty of habitability, or

Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003)

Tucker v. Hayford, 75 P.3d 980 (2003) Washington state

...condition existing before or arising after the tenant has taken possession, if he has failed to exercise reasonable care to repair the condition and the existence of the condition is in violation of: (1) an implied duty of habitability; or

Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)

Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003) Washington state

...opportunity to discover the condition and failed to exercise ordinary care to repair the condition, and (3) that the existence of the condition was a violation of an implied warranty of habitability or a duty created by statute or regulation.