Showing 1–20 of 20 results
habitability when it “failed to repair the problems in the apartment, including unauthorized control
habitability,” is based on defendant’s failure to repair plaintiff’s apartment.
thereby requiring the tenant to make repairs and improvements to make it habitable and usable.
occupied the premises, that it had to make several repairs and alterations to make it habitable and
...Under constructive eviction, the tenant could leave without any continuing obligation to pay rent; under the warranty of habitability, the tenant could repair and deduct. See Bell v. Tsintolas Realty Co., 430 F.2d 474, 478 n. 26 (D.C...
...The Restatement of Property treats the landlord’s “Obligation of the Landlord to Keep Lease Property in Repair” in one section, and in another section discussing remedies the Reporter’s Note treats both constructive eviction and the warranty of habitability...
As a fall back position, Landmark argues that the Policy excludes coverage for the warranty of habitability. In this view, the Policy was “never intended to subsidize the insured’s cost of doing business and/or repairing and maintaining rental...
This case concerns allegations of fraud and undue influence, breach of the warranty of habitability, breach of the duty to repair, breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff...
The District of Columbia Housing Regulations require landlords to perform “repairs and maintenance designed to make a premises or neighborhood safe and healthy.” 5G DCR § 2501. Together, the implied warranty of habitability combined with the District of Columbia housing regulations...
...Therefore, plaintiff’s claims for breach of the implied warranty of habitability, breach of the duty to make repairs, and breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment are properly limited to the events that occurred within the three years of...
ORDERED, that the motion is granted in part with regard to plaintiff’s claims for breach of the implied warranty of habitability, breach of the duty to make repairs, breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment and plaintiff’s claims...
...On November 10, 1969, the City Bureau of Buildings declared the dwelling unfit for habitation due to substandard conditions on the premises.2 Appellants requested appellee to make certain repairs which, with one minor exception, appellee refused to do. Appellants...
...On November 10, 1969, the City Bureau of Buildings declared the dwelling unfit for habitation due to substandard conditions on the premises. 2 Appellants requested appellee to make certain repairs which, with one minor exception, appellee refused to do. Appellants...
...On November 10, 1969, the City Bureau of Buildings declared the dwelling unfit for habitation due to substandard conditions on the premises.[2] Appellants requested appellee to make certain repairs which, with one minor exception, appellee refused to do. Appellants...
...The Court finds that the statute of limitations restricts plaintiff’s claims for breach of the implied warranty of habitability, breach of the duty to make repairs, breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, and plaintiff’s claims for intentional...
...McGee’s fraudulent misrepresentation claims are legally insufficient because she only alleges that the Church lied in the Lease about its willingness to pay for repairs. Am. Compl. ¶ 21. Under District of Columbia law, a fraudulent inducement claim cannot rest...
...Defendant-Landlords to repair the premises.' App. 24. Appellants stipulated that, if permitted, they would raise various legal and equitable defenses (unconstitutionality of the proceeding, illegality of contract, failure of consideration, warranty of fitness of habitability, unclean hands of landlord...
...Defendant-Landlords to repair the premises.” App. 24. Appellants stipulated that, if permitted, they would raise various legal and equitable defenses (unconstitutionality of the proceeding, illegality of contract, failure of consideration, warranty of fitness of habitability, unclean hands of landlord...
...Defendant-Landlords to repair the premises." App. 24. Appellants stipulated that, if permitted, they would raise various legal and equitable defenses (unconstitutionality of the proceeding, illegality of contract, failure of consideration, warranty of fitness of habitability, unclean hands of landlord...
The exchanges and conduct of the parties demonstrated that housing assistance payments continued in an effort to keep the apartments habitable and to provide the means to take the corrective action requested by HUD. During the period of time covered...