Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 41–60 of 679 results

§ 16-1124

Demisse v. Aldon Management Corp. (2020) United States federal

655 A.2d at 855-56 (holding that the Rental Housing Act’s “broad prohibition” against retaliation

§ 3612

Batista v. Cooperativa De Vivienda Jardines De San Ignacio, 776 F.3d 38 (2015) United States federal

the retaliation claim does not cite to the provision for enforcing

section of

Connie Burton v. Tampa Housing Authority, 271 F.3d 1274 (2001) United States federal

Connecticut Task Force on Public Housing and Drugs); “The fear of retaliation

Greg Moore v. Sean Garnand, 83 F.4th 743 (2023)

Greg Moore v. Sean Garnand, 83 F.4th 743 (2023) United States federal

...DISCUSSION Plaintiffs’ First Amendment retaliation claims can be divided into two categories: retaliation based on (1) Mr. Moore’s decision to remain silent when Defendants sought to question him at his office; and (2) Plaintiffs’ lawsuits against Officer Garnand and...

§ 12132

Arthur v. District of Columbia Housing Authority (2020) United States federal

Code § 2-1402.31(a)(1). Title IV of the ADA prohibits any person from retaliating against or

Section 8

Batista v. Cooperativa De Vivienda Jardines De San Ignacio, 776 F.3d 38 (2015) United States federal

also alleged the Cooperativa had retaliated against her because she

Section 8

Batista v. Cooperativa De Vivienda Jardines De San Ignacio, 776 F.3d 38 (2015) United States federal

retaliated against Batista in violation of the Fair Housing Act.

Section 8

Batista v. Cooperativa De Vivienda Jardines De San Ignacio, 776 F.3d 38 (2015) United States federal

retaliation claims under the Fair Housing Act, Batista also alleged

§ 2000e-2

Abril-Rivera v. Johnson, 806 F.3d 599 (2015) United States federal

of P.R., 707 F.3d 7, 24 (1st Cir. 2013). A "retaliation claim may

Section 8

Batista v. Cooperativa De Vivienda Jardines De San Ignacio, 776 F.3d 38 (2015) United States federal

retaliation claims in Batista's April 2010 complaint, HUD found in

Section 7

Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020) United States federal

 10 U. S. C. §932(b)(4) (Uniform Code of Military Justice; Article 132 Retaliation)

Nelson Walker, and Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach, Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. City of Lakewood, a California Municipality, 272 F.3d 1114 (2001)

Nelson Walker, and Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach, Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. City of Lakewood, a California Municipality, 272 F.3d 1114 (2001) United States federal

when an independent fair housing services provider engaged in advocacy efforts may sue the city with whom it contracts for retaliating against the provider in response to that advocacy. We hold that, as a general matter, retaliation against independent providers...

Mansourian v. Regents of the University of California, 602 F. Supp. 3d 957 (2010)

Mansourian v. Regents of the University of California, 602 F. Supp. 3d 957 (2010) United States federal

...As retaliation is “easily attributable to the funding recipient and it is always — by definition — intentional,” id., the Court allowed Jackson’s retaliation claim to proceed without regard to whether adequate pre-litigation notice and opportunity to cure the violation...

Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)

Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025) United States federal

retaliated against her for exercising her housing rights. Retaliation is a dif- ferent type of claim under § 3617 that requires a showing “that: (1) she engaged in protected activity; (2) she suffered an adverse action; and (3) there was a...

Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025)

Manal Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC (2025) United States federal

retaliated against her for exercising her housing rights. Retaliation is a dif- ferent type of claim under § 3617 that requires a showing “that: (1) she engaged in protected activity; (2) she suffered an adverse action; and (3) there was a...

Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles, 891 F.3d 776 (2018)

Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles, 891 F.3d 776 (2018) United States federal

Appellees submitted declarations in the district court describing the reasons they feared retaliation for filing grievances arising out of the cell extractions. All appellees emphasized the extreme brutality with which they were beaten and tased. See Kaba v. Stepp, 458...

A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)

A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011) United States federal

The final issue on appeal is whether the district court erred in dismissing ASWAN’S ADA retaliation claim against VCU. ASWAN contends that VCU retaliated against ASWAN by retracting VCU’s earlier promise to help pay the cost of transporting...

Nelson Walker, and Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach, Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. City of Lakewood, a California Municipality, 263 F.3d 1005 (2001)

Nelson Walker, and Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach, Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. City of Lakewood, a California Municipality, 263 F.3d 1005 (2001) United States federal

This case presents the question of when an independent fair housing services provider engaged in advocacy efforts may sue the city with whom it contracts for retaliating against the provider in response to that advocacy. We hold that, as a...

Section 8

Batista v. Cooperativa De Vivienda Jardines De San Ignacio, 776 F.3d 38 (2015) United States federal

Batista's retaliation claim as if it were an effort to enforce that

A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011)

A Society Without a Name v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 655 F.3d 342 (2011) United States federal

The final issue on appeal is whether the district court erred in dismissing ASWAN’s ADA retaliation claim against VCU. ASWAN contends that VCU retaliated against ASWAN by retracting VCU’s earlier promise to help pay the cost of trans...