DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 41–60 of 344 results

Yesler Terrace Community Council v. Cisneros, 37 F.3d 442 (1994)

Yesler Terrace Community Council v. Cisneros, 37 F.3d 442 (1994) United States federal

...On March 27, 1992, the Seattle Housing Authority served Marla Davison with notice that she would be evicted and that she had no right to a grievance hearing. The Housing Authority voluntarily rescinded this notice only after Yesler and Davison...

Yesler Terrace Community Council v. Cisneros, 37 F.3d 442 (1994)

Yesler Terrace Community Council v. Cisneros, 37 F.3d 442 (1994) United States federal

...On March 27, 1992, the Seattle Housing Authority served Marla Davison with notice that she would be evicted and that she had no right to a grievance hearing. The Housing Authority voluntarily rescinded this notice only after Yesler and Davison...

Section 1480

Barbara Brewer v. Edward R. Madigan, Etc., 945 F.2d 449 (1991) United States federal

...Before initiating the eviction proceeding, however, the landlord must provide the tenant with written notice stating the lease term violation or the reason for the eviction and informing the tenant that the eviction must be accomplished through judicial action. At...

§ 151

Barrientos v. 1801-1825 MORTON LLC, 583 F.3d 1197 (2009) United States federal

District Court for the Central District of California, seeking a declaratory judgment that the Eviction Notices violated federal law and LARSO, and a permanent injunction barring unlawful eviction of Tenants. The parties stipulated to a preliminary injunction. The district court...

Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043 (1999)

Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043 (1999) United States federal

...Harris raises three independent claims under the FHA: (1) for eviction notices contrary to established policy; (2) for disparate treatment of rental testers; and (3) for the discriminatory statement by Ms. Waldman. Central to this analysis is the characterization of...

Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013)

Williams v. Gene B. Glick Co., 501 F. App'x 543 (2013) United States federal

...sent Williams a notice of termination informing her that because she had engaged in criminal activity, she had to vacate her apartment within 30 days. When Williams did not vacate the apartment, Carriage House began eviction proceedings against her in...

Yesler Terrace Community Council v. Cisneros, 37 F.3d 442 (1994)

Yesler Terrace Community Council v. Cisneros, 37 F.3d 442 (1994) United States federal

...Then, on March 24, 1992, the Seattle Housing Authority served Marla Davison with an eviction notice stating that she would not be afforded a grievance hearing because her eviction was due to alleged criminal activity.

Yesler Terrace Community Council v. Cisneros, 37 F.3d 442 (1994)

Yesler Terrace Community Council v. Cisneros, 37 F.3d 442 (1994) United States federal

...Then, on March 24, 1992, the Seattle Housing Authority served Marla Davison with an eviction notice stating that she would not be afforded a grievance hearing because her eviction was due to alleged criminal activity.

§ 151

Barrientos v. 1801-1825 MORTON LLC, 583 F.3d 1197 (2009) United States federal

The district court granted summary judgment to Tenants, concluding that the Eviction Notices violated the Enhanced Voucher Tenants’ statutory right to remain in their apartments despite rent increases under § 1437f(t)(l)(B), 3

Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND, IND., 663 F.3d 300 (2011)

Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND, IND., 663 F.3d 300 (2011) United States federal

or convicted, she was subjected to an eviction notice. She described the combination of events as “stressful,” and as something she would never forget Id. As Stevens acknowledged, the shooting itself was a traumatic event that contributed to her emotional...

§ 151

Barrientos v. 1801-1825 MORTON LLC, 583 F.3d 1197 (2009) United States federal

...The eviction notices are invalid for failure to comply with LARSO. LARSO is not preempted by HUD’s “good cause” regulation because HUD did not intend to preempt local eviction controls when it enacted 24 C.F.R. § 982.310...

Section 14

Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984) United States federal

...a protected tenancy status for certain senior citizens, their spouses, and certain disabled persons who could otherwise have been evicted under the Anti-Eviction Act on three years’ notice plus the tender of comparable rental housing or hardship relocation compensation.

Section 2

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 393 U.S. 268 (1969) United States federal

In addition to informing the tenant of the reason(s) for any proposed eviction action, from this date each Local Authority shall maintain a written record of every eviction from its federally assisted public housing. Such records are to be...

§ 49

Linda Miller and Roger Miller v. Hartwood Apartments, Ltd., 689 F.2d 1239 (1982) United States federal

(3) In any judicial action instituted to evict the family, the owner may not rely on any grounds which are different from the reasons set forth in the notice. (d) Modification of Lease Form.

Ernest Brown v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 350 F.3d 338 (2003)

Ernest Brown v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 350 F.3d 338 (2003) United States federal

...That Complaint, which was filed as a class action Complaint, alleged that the Browns were tenants of PHA and that PHA had evicted them and other PHA tenants with little, if any, notice and no opportunity for a hearing, all...

Demisse v. Aldon Management Corp. (2020)

Demisse v. Aldon Management Corp. (2020) United States federal

notice to tenant of payment required to avoid eviction in accordance with Rule 14-II.” Super. Ct. L&T Rule 16(a). 4 • The Fourth Cause of Action, captioned “Negligence, threat and harassment,” is

Barrientos v. 1801-1825 Morton LLC (2009)

Barrientos v. 1801-1825 Morton LLC (2009) United States federal

...The eviction notices are invalid for failure to com- ply with LARSO. LARSO is not preempted by HUD’s “good cause” regulation because HUD did not intend to preempt local eviction controls when it enacted 24 C.F.R. § 982...

Section 1437d

Rucker v. Davis, 237 F.3d 1113 (2001) United States federal

...administrative agency charged with implementing the eviction provision construed it to permit eviction of ignorant tenants. This interpretation had been challenged on both policy and constitutional grounds before Congress and in HUD’s notice and comment procedures. Congress itself has...

Section 8

Park Village Apartment Tenants Ass'n v. Mortimer Howard Trust, 636 F.3d 1150 (2011) United States federal

...That injunction forbade the Defendants from increasing rents or evicting tenants in the complex due to nonpayment of increased rent until Defendants properly complied with the notice requirements. Defendants served another notice on July 25, 2008. This notice was effective...