Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 21–40 of 372 results

Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)

Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984) United States federal

4 One of the thirteen grounds for eviction under the Anti-Eviction Act is nonpayment of rent after the service of a valid notice of rent increase, "provided the increase in rent is not unconscionable ...." N.J.Stat.Ann. Sec...

Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)

Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984) United States federal

f. The person has failed to pay rent after a valid notice to quit and notice of increase of said rent, provided the increase in rent is not unconscionable...

Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)

Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983) United States federal

16 Following the appellate ruling in Philadelphia Citizens, HUD prepared identical interim rules limited to implementing the statutory increases in rent contribution rates for public housing and Section 8 tenants, based upon current definitions of income and adjusted income. Exercising...

§ 1437f

Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015) United States federal

...As a result of the 2004 change, his expected rent contribution increased 48%—from $231 to $342 per month. Plaintiff Nidia Palaez, a beneficiary since February 2004, is a single mother with a young daughter. She experienced a 177% increase...

Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)

Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977) United States federal

This court’s decisions in Thompson I and Marshall I upheld the merits of the tenants’ claims to an opportunity to be heard on proposed rent increases, and reversed the District Court’s judgments in favor of the housing officials...

Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)

Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973) United States federal

This office is not obligated, nor do we have the authority to hold hearings with tenants regarding considerations for increases in maximum rents. The rent increase referred to in your letter was granted on the basis of increases in operating...

Head v. Jellico Housing Authority, 870 F.2d 1117 (1989)

Head v. Jellico Housing Authority, 870 F.2d 1117 (1989) United States federal

...his/her rent is based, so that the rent he/she is paying is less than he/she should have been charged, then the increase in rent shall be made retroactive to the date that the increase would have taken...

Head v. Jellico Housing Authority, 870 F.2d 1117 (1989)

Head v. Jellico Housing Authority, 870 F.2d 1117 (1989) United States federal

...his/her rent is based, so that the rent he/she is paying is less than he/she should have been charged, then the increase in rent shall be made retroactive to the date that the increase would have taken...

Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983)

Williams v. Pierce, 708 F.2d 57 (1983) United States federal

...Although the rent increase technically was mandated to go into effect on October 1, 1981, HUD was given five years to implement the rent increase fully. OBRA Sec. 322(i)(3). Indeed, HUD was given discretion to extend even that...

§ 3613

Francis v. Kings Park Manor, Inc., 944 F.3d 370 (2019) United States federal

ever more litigation that increases housing costs for those who rent, renders

Section 8

United States v. Southland Management Corp., 326 F.3d 669 (2002) United States federal

requests for rent increases is not presented in this case. Our

Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)

Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977) United States federal

Meanwhile, on September 11, 1974, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which has statutory responsibility for approving any rent increase by a local public housing authority such as NCHA, see 42 U.S.C. § 1401 (1970), or a § 221...

§ 1437d

Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985) United States federal

...When a PHA raises a tenant’s rent to reflect allegedly increased tenant income, no one doubts that section 1437d(k) requires the PHA to provide an administrative hearing if the tenant complains of the increase. See, e.g.,

§ 3604

Jose Reyes v. Waples Mobile Home Park Limited Partnership, 91 F.4th 270 (2024) United States federal

who failed to comply with the Policy from the Park. Instead, Waples increased the rent

§ 151

Barrientos v. 1801-1825 MORTON LLC, 583 F.3d 1197 (2009) United States federal

flexibility in choosing whether to terminate tenants in order to increase the rent, de la Cuesta and Hammond,

Section 8

Park Village Apartment Tenants Ass'n v. Mortimer Howard Trust, 636 F.3d 1150 (2011) United States federal

In a prior action, the district court enjoined the proposed rent increase because Defendants failed to comply with the notice requirements of § 1437f(c)(8). We affirmed. Park Vill. Apartments Tenants Ass’n v. Mortimer Howard Trust, No. 06-7389...