Showing 1–20 of 679 results
(6) Retaliating against any person because that person reported a discriminatory housing practice to a housing provider or other authority.
(5) Retaliating against any person because that person has made a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in a proceeding under the Fair Housing Act .
retaliation claims require proof that the desire to retaliate was
...Held that a landlord may not evict a tenant in retaliation for the tenant's good-faith report of housing-code violations to public authorities. The court reasoned that to permit retaliatory eviction would render housing-code enforcement nugatory and...
In arguing there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict, Winter focuses solely on the retaliation aspect of 42 U.S.C. § 3617. As Quigley points out, retaliation is only one form of conduct prohibited under § 3617. Viewing...
We hold that the Fentises have standing under the Fair Housing Act to sue both for interference and retaliation. Although Councilman Svorinich is entitled to immunity for his legislative acts, he is not entitled to immunity for his alleged acts...
Over the next several months, the Fentises twice amended their retaliation claims. In response, Svorinich moved for and was granted summary judgment on the retaliation claim against him. At the same time, the district court dismissed the retaliation claim against...
In arguing there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict, Winter focuses solely on the retaliation aspect of 42 U.S.C. § 3617. As Quigley points out, retaliation is only one form of conduct prohibited under § 3617. Viewing...
advocacy efforts may sue the city with whom it contracts for retaliating against the provider in response to that advocacy.” 272 F.3d at 1120. In resolving this issue, we considered whether the city’s challenged action was taken in...
retaliate against persons who complain about unlawfully
fact regarding conspicuous acts of retaliation. Second,
pretext under disparate impact and retaliation. Therefore,
...Winter contends Quigley’s claim was “essentially a retaliation claim” and Quigley failed to prove retaliation. Section 3617 states:
statutory] authority for [an independent] cause of action for retaliation against a landlord.”
contemplated in May 2008, took place in retaliation for complaints
create a jury issue regarding retaliation, courts should not use
- 31 - altogether. Plaintiffs responded that this was in retaliation for
retaliation for constitutionally protected speech. See Bryson v.
of retaliation, a plaintiff must make a three-part showing: "(1)
occurred too early to ground a retaliation claim. The second set