Showing 1–20 of 100 results
(2) To retaliate or discriminate in any manner against any other person because such person has opposed any practice prohibited by this chapter or because such person has filed a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in any...
Section 213.070 prohibits retaliation “in any manner.” To retaliate is to “inflict in return.” Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 1938 (1976). As used in the statute, retaliation includes any act done for the purpose of reprisal that results...
Section 213.070 prohibits retaliation "in any manner." To retaliate is to "inflict in return." Webster's Third New International Dictionary 1938 (1976). As used in the statute, retaliation includes any act done for the purpose of reprisal that results...
...Hereford urges that reading the *625language of the statute as broadly as its plain meaning suggests would lead to absurd results, permitting actions for retaliation under the Act where no relationship exists between the person claiming retaliation and the person...
...Hereford urges that reading the *625 language of the statute as broadly as its plain meaning suggests would lead to absurd results, permitting actions for retaliation under the Act where no relationship exists between the person claiming retaliation and the...
The Department's argument fails to acknowledge the difference between retaliation claims asserted under federal and Missouri law. The Missouri Supreme Court has held that the Missouri Human Rights Act's anti-retaliation provision is broader than the comparable provision...
Mignone submitted three claims to the jury: (i) sexual harassment based on Fagan's conduct and comments; (ii) retaliation for her complaints against Fagan, in the form of a job reassignment and Performance Log entries; and (iii) retaliation for complaint...
submitting plaintiff’s retaliation claim constituted an impermissible roving commission.
...Where, as here, the alleged victim of retaliation is a former employee of the company charged with committing a retaliatory act, the claim promotes the Act’s purpose of prohibiting discrimination or retaliation in employment.
...Where, as here, the alleged victim of retaliation is a former employee of the company charged with committing a retaliatory act, the claim promotes the Act's purpose of prohibiting discrimination or retaliation in employment.
specific acts constituting retaliation, thereby allowing the jury to consider actionable and
Under section 213.070, retaliation must be given a broader meaning; this is because section 213.070 does not limit itself to the employer-employee relationship. Thus, retaliation exists under section 213.070 when (1) a person files a complaint...
Under section 213.070, retaliation must be given a broader meaning; this is because section 213.070 does not limit itself to the employer-employee relationship. Thus, retaliation exists under section 213.070 when (1) a person files a complaint...
submitting plaintiff’s retaliation claim constituted an impermissible roving commission.
Under section 213.070, retaliation must be given a broader meaning.... Thus, retaliation exists under section 213.070 when (1) a person files a complaint, testifies, assists or participates in an investigation, proceeding or hearing conducted pursuant to chapter 213...
specific acts constituting retaliation, thereby allowing the jury to consider actionable and
BNSF is committed to providing a work environment that fosters mutual respect and working relationships free of retaliation, harassment, discrimination and unethical conduct. With those principles in mind, BNSF does not tolerate any form of retaliation, harassment, discrimination or unethical...
We have described the elements of a retaliation claim in § I.B., above.
Retaliation does not require that a contractual relationship exist between the alleged victim of retaliation and the alleged perpetrator. It merely requires the commission or omission of an act as a quid pro quo for the filing of a complaint...
42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) (1988) prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who assert their employment rights.