Showing 1–20 of 60 results
441.780. Notice not required in certain eviction actions, when. — Notwithstanding any other provision of law concerning the procedures otherwise used in eviction proceedings, it shall not be necessary, except as provided in section 441.750 , to provide notice to...
700.600. Notice required before landlord may evict, when — landlord prohibited from increasing rent, when. — 1. As used in this section, the following terms mean:
3. Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting a landlord from evicting a tenant with less than one hundred twenty days' notice for any reason other than a change in use of the property. -------- (L. 2004 H.B...
534.345. Notice of default judgment in eviction proceeding must be sent to defaulting party. — In an action pursuant to chapter 441 , chapter 524 , or this chapter, the court in entering a judgment for possession of the premises shall, if...
...judgment of eviction, how effectuated, landlord's liability. — 1. A tenancy at will or by sufferance, or for less than one year, may be terminated by the person entitled to the possession by giving one month's notice, in writing...
...ten days, the judgment for possession will become final and the defendant will be subject to eviction from the premises without further notice. On the date judgment is rendered if the defendant is in default, the clerk of the court...
...sufficient evidence to support the motion, the court shall discharge the order of eviction or removal and shall dismiss the cause of action. The order of eviction or removal shall automatically be deemed discharged and the cause of action automatically...
...In this notice, plaintiffs corrected the eviction date from October 1, 1982, to October 1, 1983. Plaintiffs brought an unlawful de-tainer action after defendants remained in possession of the mobile home space after October 1, 1983. Defendants filed an...
...arises a rebuttable presumption that the landlord’s repossession pursuant to eviction proceedings was accomplished under the second option, even when the evicting landlord provided tenant with no notice as to which option it intended to pursue. Hurwitz v. Kohm,
...faith in evicting his tenant was for the jury, those evictions were during an interim period when the Housing and Bent Act permitted eviction for certain specified reasons upon notice from the landlord. No certificate relating to eviction had been...
Barney, current on rent prior to the eviction notice, filed a counterclaim to establish
could evict Appellant after he received notice of his default pursuant to Section 6.4.
In Teare v. Sussman, supra, the misrepresentations were made only to the plaintiff, no certificate was issued, no notice to quit was given and no eviction proceedings were filed. Said the court: “It *603
is striking. The court in the instant case could have found under the evidence that plaintiff was a sharecropper and not a tenant, a finding which clearly would have made his eviction without notice proper.
...Plaintiffs contend that a submissible case of “tortious taking” was made because defendant unlawfully came into possession of their property in that notice of eviction was given only to Jacqueline Finch and § 535.020 RSMo. 1969 required notice be given...
...The judgment was executed and appellants were evicted on October 21, 1993. Appellants appealed directly to this Court, filing notice of appeal on October 22, 1993.
Appellant’s [sic] requested recusal in the instant case, and we have evidence of judicial bias by the Trial Court giving his former client possession of the farm when there was no proper eviction notice.
...This was notice of Respondents intent to demand possession and terminate the lease. On July 1, 1996, Lori Dolan attempted to hand deliver a notice of termination and demand for possession to the Appellants; attached was a Notice of Eviction...
The thrust of the second segment of plaintiffs assignment of error, as we comprehend it, is that the evidence compelled a finding that plaintiff was either constructively evicted from the apartment or that his tenancy was terminated without proper notice.
...Jones says the court erred in entering judgment in favor of the Hoffmans on their wrongful eviction claim, because the facts show that they were sharecroppers, as opposed to tenants, and, thus, not entitled to the sixty days’ notice required...