Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 41–60 of 1,731 results

§ 42

D.C. Code § 42-3402.03 DC municipal

...act or threat not otherwise permitted by law which seeks to recover possession of a rental unit, increase rent, decrease services, increase the obligation of a tenant or cause undue or unavoidable inconvenience, harass or violate the privacy of the...

§ 42

D.C. Code § 42-3505.02 DC municipal

...Retaliatory action may include any action or proceeding not otherwise permitted by law which seeks to recover possession of a rental unit, action which would unlawfully increase rent, decrease services, increase the obligation of a tenant, or constitute undue or...

§ 42

D.C. Code § 42-3502.10 DC municipal

(h) A housing provider may adjust the rent charged for any rental unit to provide for the cost of any capital improvements which are required by provisions of any federal or local statute or regulation becoming effective after October 30...

§ 42

D.C. Code § 42-3502.08 DC municipal

...the rent charged in §§  42-3502.06 and 42-3502.07 [repealed], all substantial violations cited at the time of the last inspection of the housing accommodation by the Department of Buildings before the effective date of the increase were...

Section 2

D.C. Code § 42-3402.04 DC municipal

...To qualify for this reduction, a sale or lease cannot require monthly payments greater than existing rents, as may be increased by the annual adjustment of general applicability provided in § 45-2516(b) or a similar annual adjustment in any...

§ 266

Drayton v. Poretsky Management, Inc., 462 A.2d 1115 (1983) DC municipal

The trial court ruled that the June 1, 1979 increase was valid. We agree. Pursuant to §§ 260-267 of the Rental Accommodations Rules, the Commission authorized a general rent increase to compensate for increased operating costs. Tenant contended that under...

Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 885 A.2d 327 (2005)

Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 885 A.2d 327 (2005) DC municipal

...Since the landlord was not fairly apprised that the adequacy of the notice of rent increase was at issue, the examiner abused discretion in finding that the rent increase in this case was illegal due to inadequate notice. The examiner...

ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)

ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009) DC municipal

. Specifically, tenant alleged (1) the rent increase was larger than the increase allowed by law, (2) notice was not given thirty days prior to the rent increase, (3) landlord did not file proper rent increase forms with RACD, (4) the...

§ 42-3509

Christine Senteno v Michael Demino Final Order, No. TP-29505 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

increased or decreased, the Rent Adniinistrator may increase or decrease the rent charged,

Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 885 A.2d 327 (2005)

Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 885 A.2d 327 (2005) DC municipal

for increasing the actual rent. A rent ceiling adjustment provides a landlord with legal authorization to increase the rent. The parties do not dispute that the landlord had such authorization in the form of a rent ceiling of over $3800...

Price v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 512 A.2d 263 (1986)

Price v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 512 A.2d 263 (1986) DC municipal

After the claim of exemption from rent control had been filed, increases in Ms. Gilliam’s rent were implemented. On February 1, 1979, Ms. Gilliam was notified of a rent increase from $145 to $325 per month. A year later...

Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 885 A.2d 327 (2005)

Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 885 A.2d 327 (2005) DC municipal

D.C.Code § 42-3502.08® (2001) (“Any notice of an adjustment a rent increase under a rent ceiling] ... shall contain a statement of the current rent, the increased rent, and the utilities covered by the rent which justify the...

§ 42-3509

Chamorro v Panza Final Order, No. TP-29127 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

200 The lease between the Parties 20 I Rent increase notice dated October 20,2000 202 Rent increase notice dated October 2001 203 Rent increase notice dated November 2002 204 Rent increase notice dated November 25,2003 205 Rent increase...

§ 42-3502

Reed v Tillman Final Order, No. TP-29136 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

Provider's $SO per month rent increase in November 2006 and the subsequent $110 rent increase

§ 3502

Michael Joseph Levy & Carmel Partners, Inc. d/b/a Quarry II, LLC v. and District of Columbia Housing Commission (2015) DC municipal

treated petitions to increase rent ceilings as petitions to increase rent, which require

§ 42-3501

Farmer v Watkis Final Order, No. TP-29045 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

than the increase allowed by law; failed to file proper rent increase forms; and took a rent

Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 885 A.2d 327 (2005)

Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 885 A.2d 327 (2005) DC municipal

tion form, the tenant “did complain about his rent being too high, and that such rent was increased by more than 20%.” Thus, the examiner concluded, the landlord was on notice from the petition that the validity of the notice...