Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 41–60 of 315 results

Hill v. G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc., 859 A.2d 1055 (2004)

Hill v. G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc., 859 A.2d 1055 (2004) DC municipal

...Hill received adequate notice to vacate the premises or face eviction when he agreed to the entry of an order of possession in favor of G.E. Capital. Therefore, G.E. argues that the purposes of the notice provision of...

Golphin v. Park Monroe Associates, 353 A.2d 314 (1976)

Golphin v. Park Monroe Associates, 353 A.2d 314 (1976) DC municipal

...Habib, supra, a landlord brought a possessory action against his month-to-month tenant after serving the tenant with the statutorily required 30 days’ notice to quit.7 The tenant sought to invoke a defense of “retaliatory eviction.” Edzvards held...

Golphin v. Park Monroe Associates, 353 A.2d 314 (1976)

Golphin v. Park Monroe Associates, 353 A.2d 314 (1976) DC municipal

...Habib, supra, a landlord brought a possessory action against his month-to-month tenant after serving the tenant with the statutorily required 30 days' notice to quit.[7] The tenant sought to invoke a defense of "retaliatory eviction." Edwards held...

Bratcher v Johnson Final Order, No. TP-29478 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs)

Bratcher v Johnson Final Order, No. TP-29478 (D.C. Off. Admin. Hr'gs) DC municipal

...No tenant shall be evicted from a rental unit for any reason other than for nonpayment of rent unless the tenant has been served with a written notice to vacate which meets the requirements of this section. Notices to vacate...

Jones v. Brawner Co., 435 A.2d 54 (1981)

Jones v. Brawner Co., 435 A.2d 54 (1981) DC municipal

...It merely entitles the landlord, at his election and after the tenant has failed to cure or vacate in the thirty day period, to begin the eviction proceedings for which notice to quit must be served pursuant to § 45-906...

§ 42-3505

Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008) DC municipal

Appellant’s primary argument to us is that the trial judge erred in ruling that she was entitled only to a proper “notice to vacate” rather than a “notice to correct or vacate” before DOHA could sue to evict her...

Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001)

Grimes v. Newsome, 780 A.2d 1119 (2001) DC municipal

Appellants also argue that the notice was inadequate under 14 DCMR § 4301.2 because it did not specify what actions they needed to take in order to avoid an eviction. We disagree. The notice specifically stated that appellants had violated...

Reshard v. Stevenson (2022)

Reshard v. Stevenson (2022) DC municipal

...Reshard was evicted, she filed a notice of appeal seeking review of the trial court’s February 8 order denying a continuance and entering a default, as well as a motion seeking a stay of the eviction pending appeal. This...

§ 42-3505

Pratt v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, 942 A.2d 656 (2008) DC municipal

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of possession and order dismissal of the complaint for failure to afford appellant the notice required by the local statute. Should DCHA still wish to evict appellant for the same April 2002 activity, it must...

Carrasco v. THOMAS D. WALSH, INC., 988 A.2d 471 (2010)

Carrasco v. THOMAS D. WALSH, INC., 988 A.2d 471 (2010) DC municipal

amount necessary to avoid being evicted, it is hard to fathom why he would have ignored the pending complaint for possession unless he was unaware of it. The trial court erred in discounting Car-rasco’s lack-of-actual-notice...

Wilson v. John R. Pinkett, Inc., 265 A.2d 778 (1970)

Wilson v. John R. Pinkett, Inc., 265 A.2d 778 (1970) DC municipal

...They urge that this is an abuse of the landlord’s power to evict and defeats the Congressional attempt to preserve and protect the right to notice.

Wilson v. John R. Pinkett, Inc., 265 A.2d 778 (1970)

Wilson v. John R. Pinkett, Inc., 265 A.2d 778 (1970) DC municipal

...They urge that this is an abuse of the landlord's power to evict and defeats the Congressional attempt to preserve and protect the right to notice.

Wilson v. John R. Pinkett, Inc., 265 A.2d 778 (1970)

Wilson v. John R. Pinkett, Inc., 265 A.2d 778 (1970) DC municipal

...their statutory rights to 30 days’ notice.1 By way of analogy appellants cite, inter alia, Edwards v. Habib, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 126, 397 F.2d 687 (1968) (retaliatory evictions for reporting housing code violations); and United...

Wilson v. John R. Pinkett, Inc., 265 A.2d 778 (1970)

Wilson v. John R. Pinkett, Inc., 265 A.2d 778 (1970) DC municipal

...their statutory rights to 30 days' notice.[1] By way of analogy appellants cite, inter alia, Edwards v. Habib, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 126, 397 F.2d 687 (1968) (retaliatory evictions for reporting housing code violations); and United...