Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 41–60 of 128 results

Section 1942

Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970) California state

...have the duty to maintain leased premises in habitable condition and that tenants have the right, after notice to the landlord, to repair dilapidations and deduct the cost of the repairs from the rent. The policy expressed in these sections...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...and it is apparent the landlord will not repair, the tenant may not defend an unlawful detainer action on the ground the defect is a breach of implied warranty of habitability. There was no error in instructing the jury that...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...and it is apparent the landlord will not repair, the tenant may not defend an unlawful detainer action on the ground the defect is a breach of implied warranty of habitability. There was no error in instructing the jury that...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...This court held that there is in California a common law implied warranty of habitability in residential leases, and that under this warranty a landlord "covenants that premises he leases for living quarters will be maintained in a habitable state...

Winslett v. 1811 27th Ave., LLC, 237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 25 (2018)

Winslett v. 1811 27th Ave., LLC, 237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 25 (2018) California state

...sent an inspector to her apartment to document the habitability issues she identified. After the inspection, the inspector spoke with Sagi and informed him the apartment needed to be repaired. Sagi was furious at Winslett and told her she should...

Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)

Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001) California state

...In Green, supra, 10 Cal.3d 616, the Supreme Court traced—beginning in the Middle Ages—the property law principle that a landlord had no duty to place leased premises in a habitable condition and no duty to repair based...

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...The tenant admitted non*52payment of rent but defended on the ground that the landlord had failed to maintain the premises in an habitable condition. This court held that there is in California a common law implied warranty of habitability...

Section 669

Stoiber v. Honeychuck, 101 Cal. App. 3d 903 (1980) California state

...emotional distress because the failure to repair not only allegedly caused water damage to appellant's furnishings, it also must be deemed to constitute an injury to her tenancy interest (right to habitable premises) which is a species of property...

Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)

Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017) California state

*754Singh held himself out as the owner of the property when he rented it to Fernandes in 2010, although the property was not habitable. On November 12, 2010, Singh filed an unlawful detainer action against her by using a false...

Peterson v. Superior Court, 899 P.2d 905 (1995)

Peterson v. Superior Court, 899 P.2d 905 (1995) California state

...The tenant further reasonably can expect that the landlord will maintain the property in a habitable condition by repairing promptly any conditions, of which the landlord has actual or constructive notice, that arise during the tenancy and render the dwelling...

Section 1805

Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 168 Cal. App. 3d 176 (1985) California state

...pursuant to sections 1805(c) and 1805(e) of article XVIII, on the ground that petitioner had failed to provide adequate housing services or to maintain real parties' rental units in a habitable condition and a state of reasonable repair.

Green v. Superior Court, 517 P.2d 1168 (1974)

Green v. Superior Court, 517 P.2d 1168 (1974) California state

...warranty of habitability directly relates to the issue of possession. Holding that such breach was irrelevant to the question of possession, early California cases refused to permit a defense that the landlord had breached a covenant to repair premises. (See...

Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000)

Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1124 (2000) California state

When Wolfriver took over the building, it had serious habitability problems. The roof leaked, the plumbing and heating systems required work, the building was infested with cockroaches and rats, and seismic work had not been completed. By 1996, the building...

Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970)

Schweiger v. Superior Court, 476 P.2d 97 (1970) California state

...have the duty to maintain leased premises in habitable condition and that tenants have the right, after notice to the landlord, to repair dilapidations and deduct the cost of the repairs from the rent. The policy expressed in these sections...

Boyd v. Carter (2014)

Boyd v. Carter (2014) California state

...The 5 same is true of their defense that the eviction was retaliatory for their having exercised their 6 legal rights to report habitability conditions to the local Department of Public Safety and to 7 repair and deduct. Their statement...

Stoiber v. Honeychuck, 101 Cal. App. 3d 903 (1980)

Stoiber v. Honeychuck, 101 Cal. App. 3d 903 (1980) California state

...emotional distress because the failure to repair not only allegedly caused water damage to appellant’s furnishings, it also must be deemed to constitute an injury to her tenancy interest (right to habitable premises) which is a species of property...

Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001)

Fairchild v. Park, 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 442 (2001) California state

...704, 517 P.2d 1168, the Supreme Court traced—beginning in the Middle Ages—the property law principle that a landlord had no duty to place leased premises in a habitable condition and no duty to repair based on the...

Erlach v. Sierra Asset Servicing, LLC, 226 Cal. App. 4th 1281 (2014)

Erlach v. Sierra Asset Servicing, LLC, 226 Cal. App. 4th 1281 (2014) California state

...Hallsthammar, supra, 29 Cal.3d at page 55 and footnote 7, the Supreme Court confirmed that breach of the implied warranty of habitability can support an independent cause of action for damages, but overruled Quevedo to the extent it required...

Moriarty v. Laramar Mgmt. Corp. (2014)

Moriarty v. Laramar Mgmt. Corp. (2014) California state

...Breached the warranty of habitability by not making the needed repairs; [¶] b. Failed to maintain the Subject Premises in a safe and habitable condition; [and] [¶] c. Denied Plaintiff’s peaceable quiet enjoyment of the Subject Premises.” Following all that, Moriarty...

Section 669

Stoiber v. Honeychuck, 101 Cal. App. 3d 903 (1980) California state

...in safe and habitable condition." She also alleges that "In failing to repair the defective and dangerous conditions..., defendants have breached their statutory duty...." Appellant seeks compensatory damages for the discomfort and annoyance she suffered ($20 for each day she...