Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 21–40 of 128 results

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

To maintain a cause of action for damages based on breach of implied warranty of habitability the landlord must be given a reasonable time to repair when the tenant remains in possession. (Hinson v. Delis, supra, 26 Cal.App.3d...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

To maintain a cause of action for damages based on breach of implied warranty of habitability the landlord must be given a reasonable time to repair when the tenant remains in possession. (Hinson v. Delis, supra, 26 Cal. App.3d...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

When a tenant, aware the premises are not habitable, continues to pay the agreed rent without complaint, he reflects that he did not contemplate repairs by the landlord, that in light of the rent charged he is willing to bear...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

When a tenant, aware the premises are not habitable, continues to pay the agreed rent without complaint, he reflects that he did not contemplate repairs by the landlord, that in light of the rent charged he is willing to bear...

Section 17

Peterson v. Superior Court, 899 P.2d 905 (1995) California state

...of habitability: “A landlord is subject to liability for physical harm caused to the tenant ... by a dangerous condition existing before or arising after the tenant has taken possession, if he has failed to exercise reasonable care to repair the...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...622-623.) For this reason, contractual principles were increasingly applied to lease agreements, particularly those in modern apartment buildings where repairs may be difficult and expensive. Complex heating, electrical, and plumbing systems are often hidden from view and repairs require...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...622-623.) For this reason, contractual principles were increasingly applied to lease agreements, particularly those in modern apartment buildings where repairs may be difficult and expensive. Complex heating, electrical, and plumbing systems are often hidden from view and repairs require...

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...landlord’s breach of implied warranty of habitability by (1) continuing to live in premises despite knowledge of the defects or (2) failing to allow a landlord a reasonable time to repair before withholding rent. There is the additional question...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

The traditional common law doctrine, long followed in California, holds that a landlord, absent contrary agreement, is under no duty to maintain leased dwellings in habitable condition. Furthermore, landlord agreements to repair premises are independent of the tenant’s covenant...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

The traditional common law doctrine, long followed in California, holds that a landlord, absent contrary agreement, is under no duty to maintain leased dwellings in habitable condition. Furthermore, landlord agreements to repair premises are independent of the tenant's covenant...

Muro v. Superior Court, 184 Cal. App. 3d 1089 (1986)

Muro v. Superior Court, 184 Cal. App. 3d 1089 (1986) California state

...then stressed that a “similar” development had also occurred in that field with the departure from the traditional common law rules which had imposed no duty to render leased premises habitable or to repair absent an express contract. The Becker

Section 789

Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978) California state

Another of the landlord's basic obligations is the maintenance of the premises in habitable condition, and his failure in this regard may constitute a hazard to health and welfare fully as serious as that posed by utility interruption. However...

Boyd v. Carter (2014)

Boyd v. Carter (2014) California state

...The Carters Were Entitled to Assert and Litigate Affirmative Defenses Concerning Habitability and Retaliatory Eviction in This Proceeding 5 6 The Carters posit that the trial court erroneously prohibited them from presenting their 7 retaliatory eviction and habitability defenses, which...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...Further, in an unlawful detainer action, a tenant’s defense that a landlord has breached an implied warranty of habitability should not depend on whether the landlord has had a “reasonable” time to repair, because the issue is whether the...

Section 1941

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981) California state

...Further, in an unlawful detainer action, a tenant's defense that a landlord has breached an implied warranty of habitability should not depend on whether the landlord has had a "reasonable" time to repair, because the issue is whether the...

§ 3

Muro v. Superior Court, 184 Cal. App. 3d 1089 (1986) California state

and that repairs are often outside the reach of a tenant’s ability or finances. Also, the scarcity of adequate low or moderate cost housing has left tenants with little bargaining power, while the widespread enactment of comprehensive housing codes...

Becker v. IRM Corp., 698 P.2d 116 (1985)

Becker v. IRM Corp., 698 P.2d 116 (1985) California state

Pointing out that the traditional common law rule that the landlord had no duty to make the dwelling habitable arose in the agrarianism of the Middle Ages and is incompatible with contemporary social conditions and modern legal values, California courts...

Becker v. IRM Corp., 698 P.2d 116 (1985)

Becker v. IRM Corp., 698 P.2d 116 (1985) California state

Pointing out that the traditional common law rule that the landlord had no duty to make the dwelling habitable arose in the agrarianism of the Middle Ages and is incompatible with contemporary social conditions and modern legal values, California courts...

Green v. Superior Court, 10 Cal.3d 616 (1974)

Green v. Superior Court, 10 Cal.3d 616 (1974) California state

...California Supreme Court adopted the implied warranty of habitability for residential leases. Held that breach of the warranty entitles the tenant to defend against an unlawful detainer action for nonpayment of rent. The decision is the foundation of California tenant...

Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978)

Hale v. Morgan, 584 P.2d 512 (1978) California state

Another of the landlord’s basic obligations is the maintenance of the premises in habitable condition, and his failure in this regard may constitute a hazard to health and welfare fully as serious as that posed by utility interruption. However...