Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Citation
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-01-10
Other Sections in This Document (28)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
Full Text
507 charsThe language states “by reason of any counterclaim or defense under [G. L. c. 239, § 8A].” Ibid, (emphasis added). The statute does not limit the possible counterclaims to those relating to the physical condition of the premises.6 The eviction, upon the court’s amendment, was “without fault of the tenant” and the amount found to be due to the landlord was less than the amount found to be due the tenant; therefore, Osuagwu’s counterclaims afforded an effective defense to Lawrence’s claim for possession.