Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Citation
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-01-10
Other Sections in This Document (28)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
- Lawrence v. Osuagwu, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 60 (2003)
Full Text
471 charsCypher, J. This appeal by a tenant, Peace Osuagwu, presents two questions. First, whether G. L. c. 239, § 8A, permits a female tenant to defend against an action for possession by asserting counterclaims2 based on the landlord’s placement of an unwanted male roommate in the premises, a breach of the *61covenant of quiet enjoyment not related to the physical condition of the apartment. Second, whether the judge erred in calculating the damages awarded to the landlord.