Section 3
- Citation
- Section 3
- Parent Document
- Wallace v. Boston Rent Board, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 13 (1981)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1981-06-02
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Wallace v. Boston Rent Board, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 13 (1981)
- Wallace v. Boston Rent Board, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 13 (1981)
- Wallace v. Boston Rent Board, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 13 (1981)
- Wallace v. Boston Rent Board, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 13 (1981)
- Wallace v. Boston Rent Board, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 13 (1981)
- Wallace v. Boston Rent Board, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 13 (1981)
- Wallace v. Boston Rent Board, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 13 (1981)
- Wallace v. Boston Rent Board, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 13 (1981)
- Section 1
- Section 3
- Section 3
- Section 3
- Section 3
- Section 3
- Section 3
- Section 3
- Section 3
- Section 3
- Section 3
- Section 3
- Section 3
Full Text
409 charsWhile ordinarily the proper route to follow for a tenant who wishes to contest the validity of a decontrol order would be to seek reconsideration by the board (see § 17 of regulation 10), where the board has, as in this case, advised the tenants in the notice of decontrol that their remedy is in the courts, the seeking of a reconsideration by the board is not a condition to pursuit of relief in the courts.