Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 341038_pub.pdf

Citation: Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 341038_pub.pdf
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Source verification: official_capture_completeness_unverified
Original Source: https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/341038_pub.pdf ↗

Related Parts of This Source

Full Text

1,038 chars

According to Martin, the issue of pads is brought up once a year at a
meeting with facilities. He says he has been told multiple times that the
gym meets requirements and code.

Martin said that in writing his proposal he was not so much worried
about the threat of a lawsuit as he was about the safety of the clients using
the facilities at the RFC.

CP at 39.

In an important passage in Jose Hernandez's deposition, the following colloquy

occurred:

Q. Did you ever share with Mr. Standiford that you believed that Mr.
Martin was leaking information about the pads with a reporter with The
Bulletin, the student publication?
A. I don't believe saying that.
Q. Did you ever believe that Mr. Martin was responsible for sharing
information that led to the articles shown in Exhibit 1?
A. I don't ... I'm not in a position to just say that he did.
Q. I'm not asking you whether you're in the position. Did you

14
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.

No. 34103-8-111
Martin v. Gonzaga University