Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Berish v. Bornstein, 437 Mass. 252 (2002)

Citation
Berish v. Bornstein, 437 Mass. 252 (2002)
Parent Document
Berish v. Bornstein, 437 Mass. 252 (2002)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
2002-06-28

Other Sections in This Document (93)

Full Text

517 chars
f. Objections to the amended report. The defendants filed objections to the master’s amended report, asserting that the master’s revised conclusion about the liability of the Bornstein trustees for the unit fees was erroneous and unwarranted by the evidence; and that the master’s revised finding on damages relating to Bornstein’s failure to repair common areas was based on an improper measure of damages, relied on evidence of repair costs that was too remote in time, and was not supported by admissible evidence.