Skip to main content

Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 324427.pub.pdf

Citation
Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 324427.pub.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source verification
official_capture_completeness_unverified

Full Text

1,768 chars
6
             

No. 32442-7-III
Goodeill v. Madison Real Estate

Admin Fee Re Inv1592 $6.78
Outstanding Amount (Rent Income Sept. 2013 = 3 days) $120.002
Total Charges $557.09

Pl.'s Ex. 1 at 35. Madison applied a credit of$845.00, which represented the $800.00

security deposit and a $45.00 prepayment credit. The difference between the $845.00

credit and the total charges of$557.09 was $287.91, which Madison refunded to Ms.

Goodeill with the October 9 notice.

On October 15, Madison received Ms. Goodeill's summons and complaint. On

October 21, Madison filed a counterclaim seeking to offset the total charges from the

requested security deposit. On October 30, the district court received exhibits and heard

testimony from Ms. Goodeill and Madison's representative, Ron Dickerson. Ms.

Goodeill argued that Madison had clearly violated RCW 59.18.280 and was not entitled

to keep any of her security deposit as a result. Mr. Dickerson stated that Madison's

maintenance department had called the utility companies to obtain final amounts for the

time between when the Goodeills vacated the property and when Ms. Goodeill turned in

her keys to Madison. Mr. Dickerson argued that DavisPro's delay in providing Madison

with invoices for their work on 1502 West Cora Court constituted "circumstances beyond

the landlord's control," allowing Madison to raise the defense of offset to Ms. Goodeill's

2 Although not an issue on appeal, we are unable to find any justification for the

7
             

No. 32442-7-III
Goodeill v. Madison Real Estate

claim. CP at 31. The small claims court judge asked Mr. Dickerson to provide legal