Phyllis Ndoro v. Maritza Torres (2024)

Citation: Phyllis Ndoro v. Maritza Torres (2024)
Parent Document: Phyllis Ndoro v. Maritza Torres (2024)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2024-12-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10291534/phyllis-ndoro-v-maritza-torres/ ↗

Full Text

771 chars

Conclusion.  As we have concluded that Torres was entitled to judgment on her c. 93A counterclaims, we reverse so much of the judgment finding that Ndoro did not violate c. 93A and the order denying Torres's motion for reconsideration.  The case is remanded to the Housing Court where judgment shall be entered for Torres on her c. 93A counterclaims.  The judge shall, as discussed above, determine on remand if an award of multiple damages in accordance with c. 93A, § 9 (3), is warranted.[15]  See Grand Pac. Fin. Corp. v. Brauer, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 407, 422 (2003).  The judge should also determine reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in successfully prosecuting the c. 93A claims in the trial court.  The judgment is otherwise affirmed. So ordered. footnotes

Other Sections in This Document (44)

Full Text